Thursday, February 28, 2019
Mothers Against Driving
This essay is about a nationally  cognize lobbying  free radical known as MADD or Mothers Against  crusade. This is an  shaping that was first created by a wo globe named  sweeten Lightner whom in 1980 tragically lost her  young woman to a repeat offense drunk driver. This organization or lobbying group works very hard and whose goal is to keep drivers off the  passage who have had too much to drink and to  in any case make  genuine that drunk driving laws are enforced.The thesis statement is Mothers Against Drunk Driving has arguably been  i of the most successful public-health grassroots citizen dvocacy organizations in the  coupled States in the past century. (Fell and Voas). This whole idea of MADD started years ago when  glass Lightners daughter Carl, was walking with her friend and was struck and killed by a man who left the scene of the accident, and was drunk driving. After she was told that he actually was  only when out of Jail for two days after  beingness arrested for  ot   her hit- and- run drunk- driving crash.His record had reflected three other arrests-two resulted in convictions and  oneness was reduced to a reckless driving offense. It was soon after this that confect Lightner and a few friends started MADD to fight against drunk drivers. The first chapter that was started in  mendelevium was by a nonher woman named Cindi Lamb who was trying to fight the  item that her five month old daughter became paralyzed by a repeat drunk driver offender as well. The two women were brought  unitedly by a press secretary to congress and had a  intelligence conference that brought a  troop of attention to this impaired-driving problem that is  eerywhere.Soon all  everywhere the nation  glass Lightner was contacted to comment on high profile cases. This lobbying roup was  integrated in 1980 as a California corporation.  By June of 1981 it had achieved IRS tax-free  condition later in the year, it received$100,OOO in private funds.  Articles on the organization    appeared in  many an(prenominal) magazines and newspapers out there such as Los Angeles Times, Family Circle. Candy was the guest on many talk shows such as The  nowadays Show, Phil Donahue and others. With the great increase in media attention to the impaired-driving problem and the surge in  alcohol legislation in the 1980s, there was a heartening  decrease in alcohol- related fatal crashes between 980 an 1995. (NHTSA, 1995). MADD had developed a  unfluctuating capability to respond to the growing press and interest in this ever growing problem. This part of the essay contains the claim and  approximately of the background. There is a lot of evidence both qualitative and quantitative in MADDs  rear on the impaired-driving problem we have in our America. There is general  word meaning of the relationship between laws, their enforcement, and public education on driver perceptions of the  run a risk of being caught for DUI (driving under the influence) which affect public attitudes t   oward impaired driving. (Gladwell, 2001). MADD founder Candy has been invited to speak at the formal signing of each of the legislative bills.  half dozen of the most important pieces of alcohol safety legislation are MLDA 21 laws, zero tolerance for youth laws,. 08BAC limit laws,ALS laws, illegal per se laws and increase adoption of the legislative laws.This is part of the three tiered approach to the  remnant of drinking and driving. At the community level, MADD has chapters that help support police enforcement activities when it comes to  safe DUI enforcement and rewarding police officers who make the most DUI arrests. Before MADD offenders were given  wild sentences but now there is a lot of court monitor by MADD to assure offenders gets there Just do. This part of the essay contains some of the background and body, along with  reenforcement evidence and data and scholarly research.An  contend view to MADD comes from the American Beverage Licenses or (ABL). This organization rep   resents beer, wine and  liven retailers in the U. S. They have made many anti-MADD statements as well as criticizing General Motors. One of the claims that the ABL has made is that MADD targets social drinkersABL claims hat MADD would have you arrested if you had a glass of wine with dinner and then driven safely  internal or if you had a cocktail with your friends after work before heading home.They also claim that MADD wants to criminalize the 40 million adults that responsibly enjoy a glass of wine with dinner or a beer at a ball game and drive safely home. (Hingson and Winter, 2003) This is simply not a true statement. MADD is just in support to the lowering of blood alcohol levels to 0. 08 and that is not reached by a glass of wine or from one beer. This level is reached by an average male size ho consumes 4 drinks in 1 hour or by an average  coat female consuming 3 drinks. Social drinking does not  chance upon to a blood alcohol level of 0. 8. General Motors is viewed as being    a support for MADD but ABL claims that General Motors should be held accountable for supporting MADD. This could be viewed as a rebuttal to the opposing view of ABL. In Conclusion there is a lot of evidence that MADD has helped so many victims of drunk driving and they give so much of their time providing not only emotional support but also victim  attention programs and court accompaniments and that is hy this lobbying group is so very important to a lot of people and in helping so many.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment