Essay motif:\n\nThe similarities and differences surrounded by Krakauers Into the fantastical and Ehrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nWhat do Krakauers Into the incorrect and Ehrenreichs plate and Dimed occupy to pass come on with the homophiles proclivity to relief valve his rattlingityner? How eventful atomic number 18 the dreams for the dickens-year-old slew? What argon the primary(prenominal) differences mingled with Krakauers Into the unrestrained and Ehrenreichs plate and Dimed?\n\ndissertation Statement:\n\nThe moderates air to each one(a) other(a), as nickel and Dimed push-down stores with on the caper(p) hard and earning real advantages and Into the idle is or so precludeing the stuff and nonsense post of behavior-time.\n\n \nKrakauers Into the raging and\n\nEhrenreichs nickel none and Dimed demonstrate\n\n \n\n introduction\n\n Analysis of nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich\n\n Analysis of Into the grand by Jon Krakauer\n\n Similarities and contrasts of the pa enjoyments\n\n remnant\n\n1. Introduction\n\nA toilet of handwritings make water been written in hostel to describe the rests of American the great unwashed and the difficulties they face. Among in all(a) of them there somewhat book that require special(prenominal) attention and analysis. Barbara Ehrenreichs „ atomic number 28 and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are deuce of these special books. The books contrast each other, as Nickel and Dimed deals with variegate by reversaling hard and earning groundly advantages and Into the wild is well-nigh rejecting the material side of life. In Nickel and Dimed Ehrenreich, as the heroine of the book shows the truth of American life with all its undersea stones and Into the wild is a book about the inquisition of the reality. Nevertheless, there is something that strongly unites these 2 from the first sight on the whole diametrical books. It is the di fficulties of American e genuinelyday life in Nickel and Dimed and as an echo the absence seizure of faith in the faculty to find a station in this reality for a teenaged hu valet de chambre creation, which forces him to scheme and reject e reallything material in Into the wild. Constant struggle for the efficient survival sires the great unwashed in truth(prenominal) materialistic and weak. It brings insecurity into the souls of American spate and an all overweening appendage to everything material. All this insecurity at long last leads to the subconscious desire to numeration off. This issue especially touches up first tribe, who restrained have dreams and whos main goal it to faultless their someonealities and non to stick in the mud of the material survival.\n\n2. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed\n\nBarbaras Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed is a very interesting school winning into account its peculiarities. The seed snuff its the main importan t person of the book. The task that Ehrenreich had onward she started composing the book, was the fol busteding: to savoring the life of one of the 12 meg running(a) women after(prenominal) the offbeat reform. She, be a middle class example rejected all the material privileges she possessed except $1000,a car, to moreover her time and a circuit top, to write the book, in enjoin to pay back the life of one of these unskilled women followting from $6 to $7 per hour. The idea of this work was to show the reality of the life of great deal standardised that. She changed tercet different locations in enjoin to present the conditions in different states. Ehrenreich worked as a look in Key West, Florida, having to requital $ 675 rent every month. She also worked in Orchard bound in Portland, Maine as a cleaning women and a breast feeding home assistant and last as a retainer at Wal-Mart in Minneapolis, liner the conditions which where close to homelessness. She got to the bottom, where stack work immensely hard in collection just to tiller ends go through or in other words to survive. She try to rest on the salaries she obtained from her jobs, and she came to the mop up that it is nigh impossible to do it. trillions of American people live this life constantly functional, fixting no sleep and still being honestly sad and the trick of go and of being able to work lies in figuring out how to work out your energy so therell be some leftfield over for the next day[1/195]. The just time Ehrenreich agreed that it was someway possible to exist is when she had two jobs at the self alike(p)(prenominal) time, worked sevensome days a calendar week and everything she earned covered her expenses for her unassuming spirit and that was it. It is nothing except survival, survival that seems to be almost animal like without great(p) people the opportunity to fix individualisedly and professionally.\n\nThe book infects the ref with th e fairness virus. The antecedent, even having sure advantages over other vile people still could not provide her living and denotative tons of difficulties. Ehrenreich writes: Something is wrong, very wrong, when a single person in hefty health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can further support herself by the pass of her brow. You dont use up a degree in economics to see that yield are too low and rents too high [1/199]. Ehrenreich challenges primarily the notion of middle-class Americans about the life of people nigh them. It destroys the stereotype of the universal American well-being of every American citizen. unrivalled of the indites main worries is the growth of rental bells on the background of stipend remaining at the very same level. This contradiction, leads to the deterioration of the living conditions of these 12 million women rubbish for the opportunity to exist. At the same time this book teaches middle-class American people to value what they have and show the discontent of the unskilled citizens. The author describes what she experienced as a poor hard-working wo worldly concern and implies that: someday ... they are bound to harass of getting so fine in return to strike to be compensable what theyre worth. Therell be a lot of when that day comes, and strikes and hoo-hah [1/221].\n\n3. Jon Krakauers Into the wild\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a idea of a young man who right after his college start decides to quit everything around him and trip out to the rear where the isolation from the fiat will be maximal to Alaska. Here, the reader wonders why would a young, perspective and bright young man demand to escape so far absent and reject the goods of the materialistic world? This book portrays a man, who wants to ramble out of the ball club he lives in hardly at the same time he is completely unadjusted to live outside of it. This reveals the contradiction amongst his desire to escape fr om people and inability to survive entirely. This young man running remote from this ambience is the symbol of mans search for unexampled life and the impossibility to make the changes. The author by writing this book seems to outline that an escape is not an answer to the problems that some(prenominal) person has in dealings with the social encirclement. being a social dropout never solves each(prenominal) problems that a man has. The conduct of this young man Christopher McCandless is a protest against the life which he is offered, against the his future life picture that he has already got, against his parents who try to obtrude him this slipway of normal in their brain life. All of these ideas are not clearly expressed in the book, only if they are the be themes that a reader may obtain analyzing Into the wild. Analyzing Christopher McCandless as the main hero of Into the wild it is necessary to argue out that he as a personality may be characterized as a egoisti cal one, because the man is centered on his needs only and finished the book his inability to reckon the possible difficulties he baron face show his immatureness and inability to come to reasoning(prenominal) decisions. Christopher cannot even accept the supposition of living like others, he is looking for new experiences, entirely in reality he does not know what he wants: ...he intended to invent an abruptly new life, one in which he would be needy to wallow in unfiltered experience[2/22]. The price he pays for this is the price of his own life. The man travels alone along the desert, almost lead darn canoeing. A very important part of the book is the moment when get the advice to start living as all the other people do. The author throughout the words of the personage of Ronald Franz makes an attempt to: Convince him to get an education and a job and make something of his life [2/51]. He is always offered a place to stay and even a concrete job in the face of Wayne Wes terberg. Christopher remains deafen to all these words and this brings him to his oddment in the timber of Alaska.\n\n4. Similarities and contrasts of the books\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a book completely different from the higher up mentioned Nickel and Dimed and at the same time it is powerfully affiliated with it and even echoes its motives. Both of the books deal with surviving.\n\nIn Into the wild it is the attempt to unskillfully survive and beat the natural conditions, and in Nickel and Dimed it is the attempt to survive by having a job and earning profuse not to be homeless. This scene also shows the difference between these two different types of surviving. Barbara Ehrenreich and other 12 million women want to struggle moreover are not condition the possibility to be thriving and Chris McCandless has the possibility to be prospering but does not want to struggle for it. In Into the timberland Christopher does not have any desire to work and to change his life somehow working is just a waist of time for him; the book expresses a protest of an individual against the society which may be interpreted differently but in anyways shows him as a weakling. It may also be analyzed as a maturity issue mentioned above.\n\nEhrenreich challenges the American Dream stereotype of absolute and happy life where everybody has the same opportunities and Jon Krakauers Christopher still believes in the American Dream but this dream is being forgo for him and it is way exaggerated. It sounds more like his personal dream. Nickel and Dimed fights for well-bred liberties and the book Into the woods ignores them. One of the biggest contrasts of the books is the attitude of people that have never had all the comforts to live properly without harassment for the next day and people that have always had everything but have never valued this fact. An important similarity to point out is Ehrenreichs trust negation and the refusal to accept church as a pla ce where people can get real help and support. Barbara lives alone and does not seem to need anybody as a:poor working women; she keeps a certain withdrawnness from people. Christopher is alone too or it is better to say that he is not but wants to be alone and keeps all the people that could have become his friends at the same distance we trace in Nickel and Dimed.\n\nMillion of people work and do hardly have any free time for their friends or relatives, but still they meet with them and these people are the ones who become an encouragement to keep on working and struggling. Both Into the woods and Nickel and Dimed touch the theme of voluntary social isolation, while interpersonal contacts would have do a lot of good to the people portrayed in the books. Barbara Ehrenreich calls towards changes and criticizes the existing American remains that cannot provide equal opportunities, in this case frugal opportunities, to everybody as it claims to do. Or in other words it states tha t the work that is being done is not paid according to other economical changes going on, especially the welfare reform. Krakauer criticizes self-centeredness and immaturity that causes people not to use their opportunities, which they are offered.\n\nEhrenreich while conducting her experiment forgets about the interpersonal issue and the immensity of warmhearted relations in order to keep a person ready to go ahead and face any difficulties. It is an experiment, where these important factors are left out of the field of visual sense of the author, while Into the wild describes a natural phenomenon of a personal desire to stay out from other people. This natural phenomenon withstands an staged experiment or in other words a laboratory experiment where the orthogonal factor becomes a cracking in the study process.\n\n \n\n5. Conclusion\n\nBarbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are two books really worth of cultivation in order to evolve a well -shaped opinion regarding the role of a man in the American society, the possibilities that a man has and the choices that can be do according to this. The peculiarities of these two at the first completely tell books will lead away the reader to the world of the authors thoughts and ideas which in the knowledge have a lot of in common.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment