Power, Desire, Difference Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Power, Desire, Difference - Essay ExampleThe specific psychical concerns of the typic may guide been played down in some feminist writing, political issues pretend been played down (and deep confused with psychical ones) in recent critiques of essentialism. The thing is, the challenge to Lacan is often read as, or cut to, the challenge to patriarchic structures of language and phallogocentrism, which of course in part it is. Lacans theory also covers the psychical organization, the melodic phrase that the symbolic is the condition of sanity it is not purely about the patriarchal order of language (Chodorow 1998167). It should stimulate evident that this facet of Lacans theory has also received attention in French difference feminisms, specially from Irigaray. Moreover, it is only when this aspect of Lacans theory is taken into account that the British feminist defence of him makes any sense.The symbolics patriarchal nature relies on the interlocking functions of the symbolic father, and the notorious phallus. Lacan says the symbolic father intervenes in the complex quantity ties among mother and child (Withford 1986). For Lacan the actual father matters infinitely less than his structural, symbolic position as an interfere third party. In the imagination, the fathers place is similar to the occupied by language, in that language intervenes in the imaginary dyad as the symbolic words that rupture the threads of phantasy that hold lack at bay and the illusion of union in place. To borrow the vocabulary of mainstream psychoanalysis for a moment, this intervention is decisive to the process of psychical differentiation, to the subjects differentiating itself from others and this is one reason why sanity relies on the symbolic (Withford1988). How changing the depend upon of either the intervening third party or the primary care-giver, or the actual fathers affectionate spot, would assume the process of differentiation is another matter but real changes in either parenting models or the social position of women and men must have consequences for the symbolic. The phallus is the mark of need, and diversity in general and intimate difference in particular. As the mark of need, it pertains to the fact that the subject is not complete unto itself. It is here that the symbolic father and phallus connect the former breaks up the illusion of unity, the latter represent that break (Withford 19867). As the mark of difference in general, the phallus is allied with the logos, with the principle that the identification of difference is the condition of logic and language alike. That is to say, thinking as such requires difference. This brings to a critical Lacanian claim that sexual difference is the significant one in being able to speak, thus think and, mutatis mutandis, that speaking is critical to sexual difference. The opthalmic recognition of sexual difference is a channel connecting the heterogeneous experience of the feeling, sensi ng body to something that is oddish to it the differential structure of language in turn, that language allows it name the difference.In short, Irigaray, like Mitchell, may have a clinical issue in mind the idea that the phallus is represented by the extremity implies, according