Normative and Descriptive Approaches

Decision making can be real difficult when both choices ar very appealing. We ar faced with many decisions daily and have to nark sure we choose the honest one. honorables play a major role in decision making. It whollyows object lesson philosophy to play its part. It gives you the freedom to choose decent from wrong. In this physical composition you will be introduced to normal and descriptive morals. You will be given(p) a definition, a contrast, how the border ones may impact the criminal justice original, how the approaches are similar and vary, and which approach you feel is better and why. normative ethics is the stolon of philosophical ethics that check overs the set of chiefs that arise when we think about the question how ought one act, honorablely speaking? Normative ethics can be divided into the sub-disciplines of moral theory and applied ethics. In recent eld the boundaries between these sub-disciplines have increasingly been dissolving as moral t heorists belong to a greater extent interested in applied problems and applied ethics is turn more profoundly philosophically informed.Normative ethics is distinct from meta-ethics because it examines standards for the truth and wrongness of actions, while meta-ethics studies the meaning of moral language and the metaphysics of moral facts. (Wikipedia. org) This approach is similar to how religious people view their God. They say that God gives the single(a) the choice to choose whats right and wrong. Christians also conceive that decade and Eve utilized the power of whats right and wrong. They were given the descriptive approach by God and they chose otherwise. For any act, in that respect are one-third things that might be thought to be morally interesting first, there is the agent, the person performing the act second, there is the act itself third, there are the consequences of the act. There are three types of normative ethical theoryvirtue, deontological, and consequ entiality, for each one emphasizing one of these elements. (moralphilosophy. info) descriptive ethics, also known as relative ethics, is the study of peoples beliefs about morality. Descriptive ethics is a form of verifiable research into the attitudes of individuals or groups of people.Those working on descriptive ethics station to uncover peoples beliefs about much(prenominal) things as take accounts, which actions are right and wrong, and which characteristics of moral agents are virtuous. Research into descriptive ethics may also investigate peoples ethical ideals or what actions societies condemn or punish in truth or politics. Because descriptive ethics involves observational investigation, it is a field that is commonly investigated by those working in the fields of evolutionary biology, psychology, sociology or anthropology. learning that comes from descriptive ethics is, however, also used in philosophical arguments. Normative ethics is also distinct from descripti ve ethics, as the latter is an empirical investigation of peoples moral beliefs. To put it another way, descriptive ethics would be concerned with determining what proportion of people believe that killing is always wrong, while normative ethics is concerned with whether it is mark to hold such a belief. Hence, normative ethics is sometimes say to be prescriptive, rather than descriptive.However, on certain versions of the meta-ethical view called moral realism, moral facts are both descriptive and prescriptive at the same time. (Wikipedia. org) Descriptive ethics deal with what the population actually believes to be right and wrong, and holds up as ideals or condemns or punishes in law or politics, as contrasted to normative ethics which deals with what the population should believe to be right and wrong, and such concepts as sin and evil.Society is usually balancing the two in some way, and sociology and social psychology are often concerned with the balance, and more clinical assessments and instruments to determine ethical attitudes. (knowledgerush. com) A criminal justice professional has morals they mustiness abide by to even out the right decision. They must know whats right and wrong, and know how to distinguish the two. Normative ethics impacts criminal justice professionals by allow them to show the criminal to gather in that what they have done is wrong.It also allows the criminal justice professional to stroller the criminal on the consequences of their actions and ways to prevent another offense. Descriptive ethics impacts criminal justice professionals by allowing them to do the norm against the population. They are nerve-wracking to establish criminal justice when the population may see that all criminals should be punished. I feel that the normative approach to ethics is the best approach. This approach allows one to make his own decision and not borrow what everyone is saying.Everyone should be able to make his or her own decision wh ether it is right or wrong. If you make the right decision, then you reap good things, and if you make the wrong decisions, you reap bad things. The approaches are similar because they stress the value of whats right and wrong. It shows that a decision have to be make whether its right or wrong. They vary because one allows the individual to make the decision of right and wrong, and the other allows the population to dictate whats right or wrong not giving the individual to make the ethical decision.Referenceshttp//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normative_ethicshttp//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptive_ethics