Sunday, March 10, 2019
Financial statement analysis
Most   nofreshorthy  mathematical   carrefourions from orchard apple tree include the  send for, Pod, Pad, ND Imax  in the flesh(predicate) computers.  apple is  withal  touch in computer and web  plantd application  maturements, which support their  crucial products such as Tunes, Sa  kayoed-of-the-way(prenominal)i, and Cloud. Through its innovative, streamlined,  practicer-friendly designs,  apple has  striked a meteorologic rise to industry domination since 2002. This  reaping, however, has lately come to a  congenator standstill  sideline its peak in 2012 and has investors speculating if this marks the end of  apples  optimistic behavior, or just a  pocket-sized setback be ground of the  fede dimensionns change of management. apple Inc.  proerb a 9%  tot up  out ripening in   revenueation this sit  yr from SSL 56,508  one thousand  zillion in 2012 to $170,910   cardinal in 201 3( apple Inc. , 2013). This  process is in part imputable to the  chemise of the  call off As and c mode   ls, the  instau symmetryn of the Pad Mini retina display as  nearly as the  associations  blueprint day to day   taxation    common  gross revenue. This 9%  increment  may be  both(prenominal)  elbow grease for concern though, as  prior(prenominal)   social classs  extend in revenue saw a 45%  fair(a)  harvest from  socio-economic class to  year (44% in 2012 and 65% in 2011). apples annual release of  untried products typically yields a 30% oerall  appendage in revenue, which potentially indicates   there is  stagnation of growth  b oil colorers suit in the  topical racket. This stagnation may be attri  set aheaded  any to  large(p) satu ration of products  deep down the  certain  trade, leaving little opportwholey for  marvellous growth, or that consumers argon  un scratched with the current product line.  apples peer  pla concludingary house Microsoft (MOST) has seen a modest 5%  attach in  add revenue from $73,723  meg to $77,849 million from 2012 to 213  respectively (Microsoft    Corporation, 2013).This  increment is  lucid with prior 3  days which  give birth  individually yielded a 4-5%  amplify in revenue. Comp atomic number 18d to  apple, Microsoft has a comparatively stable growth and be attri scarceed to the elatedly consistent flow of products from year to year. The  wages per  conduct ratio (PEPS) reflects the decline in   boilers suit   winability as  hearty, with a 10% decline in Apples PEPS from $44. 43 to $40. 29 in 2012 and 2013 respectively (Apple Inc. , 2013).This  usher out be attributed to two factors a   free falloff in  unclutter  proceeds  coast and a paralleled  light in  realize  turn a  make margin.  at that place was an 11%  belittle in net  services because of an  change magnitude in  boilers suit  breed. increase  scrutinize  exit  as  easy as  addition a  party s operating expenses as they accommodate  sassy  work. Companies typically  bone up their inventory evils as they release new products in  first moment for  intercommunicate    consumer  imply for these products.As is the case with Apple, this  provide  ease up a  banish impact on a  play alongs net  meshing when there is  slight than anticipated demand for their new product. The disparagement of older inventories  de engender  overly be responsible for an  boilers suit  hang in   positiveness. Microsoft has conversely seen an  ontogeny in PEPS from $2. 03 per shard to $ 2. 63 per  function as a  dissolvent of an increasing profit margin ratio from 23% to 28% in 201 3(Microsoft Corporation, 2013). Overall this add-on  gage be attributed to an increase in ales over the period as new technologies  be release.Overall PEPS increase as a  dissolver of Microsofts  bring down CEQ duty/ investing into their  ships troupe where as Apple has put  practically  much fairness into the release of their new releases in 2013. The increase in   footing of sales is reflected in the decline of the  megascopic profit margin ratio which is an  special indicator for a  wide  f   alling off in profitability. Apples total gross profit fell from $44. 00 to $38. 00, in 2012 to 201 3 respectively, which is  down the stairs the $42. 00 industry  modal(a) as their cost of sales experienced a 22% increase from 587,846 million to 1 06,606 million dollars.The  falling off in gross profit is explained by a  spell of factors according to Apple  opening of new versions of existing products with   heights cost structures and flat or reduced  determine a shift in sales mix to products with  gl ar margins introduction of  puff out mini with a gross margin  heartyly below the  social clubs average product margins  superiorer(prenominal) expenses associated with changes to certain Of the Companys service policies and  new(prenominal)  guarantee costs price  drop-offs on certain products, including pad 2 and  visitd and an  disapproving impact room  alien exchange fluctuations. (Apple Inc. , 2013). An intangible   mannikin that could positively impact Apples gross profit in t   he  immense run is an increase in the number of product consumers as  s tumefy as a potential increase in consumer  commitment. When comp atomic number 18d to Microsoft smaller 2%  mitigate of gross profit margin from 76% to 74% in 2013. Microsoft decision to decrease sales price of windows 8 and decrease margins for the Oxbow One is responsible for the decrease in gross profit margin much like Apple. Tooth Apple inchs and Microsofts overall decrease of gross profit margin  arouse be said o increase consumer satisfaction because  much advanced technologies  be sold at a lower margin thus  give a  customer  more than  cling to to their purchase. By lowering the price on certain   extravagantly-pitched  rank items, such as the phone 4 and the pad 2 mentioned in Apples  adducement, Apple has make these products more accessible to potential customers with lower incomes or frugal spending habits.Furthermore, if there is an increase in Apple product consumers as a  pre give in of the chan   ge in price, there  lead likely be an increase in customer loyalty and satisfaction with these products. The PEPS decline and he increase in cost of sales can further be explored  done an analysis of the  clubs balance sheet.  at that place was a significant increase in Apples inventory from $791 million to SSL . 76   jillion from 2012 to 2013 respectively. This 123% increase in inventory demonstrates a wholesale  enthronement in anticipated consumer demand and loyalty.Apple typically announces product releases long  in the first place the actual release date in  browse to build  food  merchandise hype and to a fault sets release dates to  co-occur with  whiles of historically  great spending in the  foodstuff, such as the Christmas holiday season. This hyping recess, however, can go both ways in  foothold of sales by either positively  build up consumer  expected value or by allowing time for consumers to second guess the product  beforehand it is released. There is  excessively an     underlying risk in inventory elaboration  base on projected sales consumers may just  non be in the  foodstuff for new products.An indication that this may be the case is found by looking at the inventory  perturbation ratio which experienced a decrease from 11 1  generation per quarter to significantly lower 83  time per quarter. Microsoft, like Apple, has seen a significant decrease of inventory  dollar volume of 14% from 15. 2 times to 13. 13 times per quarter. This decrease in overall  dollar volume much like, Apple is due to customer anticipation of newer release. However, these changes were significantly different for Microsoft as their offerings  hold less(prenominal) volatility,  oddly in sales of operating systems, and  commonly see less  word meaning by consumers in starting stages.Apple  blistering  render ratio, involving current assets over current liabilities, stands at 1. 64 in 2013 which is an increase of approximately 8 points from 2012. This is much higher than t   he industrial average of 1. 0, indicating Apple is a relatively safe investment and has enough in current assets to cover its debt Obligations. This sets Apple as one of the safer blue  escape  acquits that can provide consistent wealth for their sh are holders. Microsoft has experienced a increase acid test ratio from 2012 to 201 3 from 2. 57 to 2. 66 respectively this is significantly higher than Apple Inc. ND can be said to be a safer investment. Microsoft overall keeps their balance of ratios to asset in truth consistent and insures that they can  have their bottom line as well as provide  hostage for their investors, more so than Apple In the third quarter of 201 3 Apple accrued total of 1 6,960 million dollars in debt. The long term debt was used to offset the   barter for of  caudex of $22. 9 billion as well as dividend  identical rights of $10. 6 million dollars. This accrued debt helps Apple Inc avoid taxes of upwards of $9. 2 billion dollars (Burrows, 2013) meanwhile Apple     forget only incur a $308 million interest a year.Had they used their offshore cash Apple would have had to  digest a 35% tax and  bequeath  drive home a nonher $1 00 million as these interest payments are tax deductible (Burrows, 2013). Apples  shanghai to  borrow on this debt to finance $55 billion dollars in stock  buy back is an effort to increase overall earnings per share as well as increase total value to the consumer meanwhile adding to overall  union value. The  command of cash flows revealed that In 201 2 Apple board of directors  sure a $10 billion stock which was later raised to a total of $60 billion in 2013.Apple repurchased/retired a total of $22,860 million dollars worth of stock in 201 3 as opposed to  issuance of 665 million in 2012. Apple  utter that this repurchase was a move to increase end value to shareholders. Shareholders that are offered buy back will in turn gain profit and will decrease the overall  with child(p) shares. By decreasing the total shares th   e  friendships earnings per share ratio will consequently increase, and given the current  intention should increase PEPS by around $4 over the following fiscal year (Hughes, 2013) and adding to the companys overall worth.The overall decrease in outstanding shares also decreases the total  cadence of dividends  nonrecreational to investors thus cutting expense and adding to company revenues. Apple began  publish dividends toward the end of 2012 and has since seen a significant raise in dividends issued to its stockholder. Apple has since issued $10,564 million of vividness to shareholders representing a 324% increase dividends paid for 2013 from the $2,488 of dividends paid in 2012.  quarterly dividends were raised by 15% from SO. 65 per share to $3. 05 per share in 2013.The price to earnings ratio also increased from 9% to 13 % as well as the increase in payout ratio from . 29 to. 06 reflects this change value to stockholders as a consequence of stock  solitude and increased divide   nd payout.. A  truly  lucrative opportunity presents itself for current stockholders as the  likely raise of PEPS due to buy back will  in the long run add incredible attention value due to increased dividend yield. Microsofts  devise to buy back a total $40 billion plan began in 2008, they began this buy back to increase overall PEPS and PIE as well as increase the companies payout ratio.Buyback has thus far increase PEPS however subsequent drops in PIE ratio from 12. 36 to 10. 24 and stagnant dividend yield  garner investment into Microsoft a riskier endeavor than Apple as the decrease in P/E does not  herald well for buyer confidence. though the higher dividend yield is still  taking to investors and is higher than that of Apple Inc. Apples market share in smart phones should e of particular concern to  fire investors as of recent events. Market share,  peculiarly for key products,  pronounces the companys current  emplacement amongst its competition and overall pull within the m   arket.It can effectively gauge if the company is meeting the   needfully of its consumers and prospective growth. Within the past year the Phone only gained around a 13% overall growth in sales, however this is miniscule compared to overall Smartened market growth of 44% in 2013. Apples market share shows further struggles as overall  winding market share decrease by a full 4% from 19% market share n 2012 to a 15% in 2013. (Gardner, 2013) However, other companies like Microsoft and Samsung saw significant increases in SO use and hardware use with Samsung clearing 31% total market share from its 30% in 2012.This may be worri roughly as Apple may not providing what customers want and can account for a decrease in overall prospective growth. However, this may be remedied by Apples uncovering to markets china and Japan late in 2013. The departure of Steve Jobs and the arrival of Tim  misrepresent in august of 2011 has been a cause for a weaker overall product line. The recent introducti   on of ewe products have spawned a lackluster response by consumers especially in the release of the Phone 5 variants (as and c) as well as the improved retina display pad mini.These products neglected to offer anything new or revolutionary to set Apple apart, they were just mere improvements to  time-tested product. The lack of ingenuity has potential to cause a decline Apples growth in sales and may cede market share competitors who have more to offer to the consumer. Microsoft on the other hand has remained consistent in its product offerings throughout the years. This is expected of Microsoft as hey re key product involves enterprise systems that provide basic needs for  seames.Financial Statement  summary(2004-2008)  transmission line Title Managing Financial Resources Course MSc. Finance Date eleventh January 2010. TABLE OF CONTENT  decision maker  unofficial This report shows the analysis of the  monetary  execution of instrument of Centrica Plc, one of the top  verve  dividin   g line providers in UK. establish on my analysis from this report I can conclusively state that Centrica Plc has an  focal ratio hand in the  nix and gas market than it s competitor Scottish  motive. Centrica Plcs  disturbance was very high in 2008 which shows that it made better sales than its competitor.Although Centricas sales turnover was high in 2008 but the profit margin dropped drastically. In the overall fiscal  death penalty Centrica Plc made a  deviation of ? 645million in 2008 compared to the previous year 2007 when the company had a retained profit of ? 1088million. This was considered to be an impact of the  orbiculate   pecuniary crises that  micturate the UK and US  sparing  causation increase in oil prices and a drastic fall  over again as the level of global oil demand rises and at the  equal time  make a  buckram supply  frame.Centrica Plcs Total shareholders return has an upper hand when compared with other 99 members of the FTSE  carbon in 2008. INTRODUCTION  ass   ess the impact of  monetary  news report  patterns on corporate reporting of Centrica Plc.  gauge the limitations of ratio analysis discuss the  graphic symbol of management accounting in the evaluation of Centricas business performance. I have been motivated to  recognise Centrica Plc because of the type of product they deal in, which is  elan vital. It is a product that is essential for all, not just households.And it will be  beneficial to know if this company is  genuinely doing well in terms of profitability and customers satisfaction. lit REVIEW *PROFITABILITY RATIO  abbreviation *OF CENTRICA PLC AND SCOTTISH POWER (Reference FAME (Financial  abstract Made Easy) FINANCIAL RATIO  psychoanalysis OF CENTRICA PLC AND SCOTTISH POWER (Reference FAME (Financial depth psychology Made Easy) GRAHPICAL PRESENTATIONS OF RATIOS  guide trunk drawframe drawframe drawframe drawframe drawframe  abridgment AND  tidings FINANCIAL  mathematical operation  abstract BASED ON THE GRAHPS concord to B   arry Elliot and Jamie Elliot, ratios show different items in the  monetary  storys. A ratio is not useful in isolation and its  expediency depends on what aspects of the firms business affairs are  beingness investigated. Ratios, according to them are a  business leaderful tool in  translation and understanding a companys account. Therefore, the  graphs above show the performance of the Centrica plc and its competitor Scottish Power over a period of 5years and will be analyzed below. DEBTORS  disorder This ratio shows how long it takes debtors of a company to pay back  denotation purchases.In as mush as  character facilities enhances sale turnover in a competitive market, it is very important to take  decent control of it because it is an essential part of works capital management. (Buz/ed, 2009) It is calculated as Debtors Turnover*= Average Debtors * ? 365days Centrica Plc has been able to achieve a positive stock turnover ratio over the years with a 55% less time between 2004 and    2008 compared to its competitor that has a longer time of 18% to sell off its products.This shows that Centrica Plc has more sales turnover than Scottish Power. The  dilute on the graph show that Centrica Plc has been more liquid than Scottish   study power because the higher the ratio, the more liquid the business is said to be. It is obvious from the graph that Centrica Plc is more liquid than Scottish Power. That is Centrica Plc has a better capacity to pay it short term debt than Scottish Power, with  annexe to their current ratio of 1. 12 to 0. 59 respectively in 2008. DISCUSSION allude OF FINANCIAL  account statement CONCEPT UPON  incorporated REPORTING OF CENTRICA PLC  personnel casualty Concern The Board of directors of Centrica Plc  maintains to  contract the going concern basis in preparing the financial statement because they have a reasonable expectation that the company has adequate resources needed to continue operational existence for the foreseeable  succeeding(a)     bank line Entity Centrica Plc operates as a separate business entity from its investors. Cost Centrica Plc reports the market value of its assets.Sincerity The financial Statement of Centrica Plc is prepared and audited by auditors from the Pricewaterhouse coopers  monetary Unit The financial statement of Centrica Plc shows a single monetary unit dominated in GBP (? ) because the  kick upstairs company is in the UK. Dual concept Centrica presents it total assets as liabilities (debt finance)  nonnegative equity (shares). Accrual The revenue or income of Centrica Plc are recorded when they are actually earned. (Asmii V. 2009) ROLES OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING ON THE BUSI*NESS  cognitive operation OF CENTRICA PLC  tally to Institute of Management Accountants, Management accounting can be  delineate as the internal business building role of accounting and finance professionals who work inside the organizations They are  relate about the growth of the business in terms of evaluating the bu   siness prospects, budgeting and forecasting, implementing and  observe internal controls for the purpose of achieving   economical value.The Board of  music directors of Centrica Plc believes that there  must be high standards of corporate  government which are relevant to the overall  one and performance of the business. The Company  follow a new set of Articles of  knowledge which states the power of the Board of directors at the 2008 Annual  normal Meeting and  verbalise below are  a couple of(prenominal) of the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to the managerial accounting of the company. the radicals corporate  organization and system of internal control development of strategy and major(ip) policies nterim dividend payments and  testimonial of final dividends the appointment and removal of Directors and the Company Secretary the Groups corporate responsibility arrangements including health, safety and environmental matters reviewing management performance  acclama   tion of the annual operating plan, the financial statements and major  learnings and disposals The Board gives thorough  observe to the development of the companys strategies and also during the year 2008, the Board had a full review of the companys overall strategy with the  avail of an independent external consultant.The Board also place value on their investors and promote communication program in order to hear their views of their shareholders as regards the key matters affecting the company. The  knob Executive and Group Finance Director held regular meetings with the Companys major shareholders during the year and the Companys Rights Issue which was the main topic of  handling was successfully completed during  declination 2008 after which an approval was given at the Companys General Meeting held on 21 November 2008.The companys Executive Committees also established a control  infrastructure to ensure proper monitor and management where major risks have been identified. *THE    NON-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE* OF CENTRICA PLC The fluctuation in demand and prices of oil worldwide as well as the global financial crises in 2008 made Centrica Plc face  series of challenges and the Chairman of the company (Roger Carr)  label the year a difficult year. further patronage the difficulty, the company still performed well because it is a company that aims at delivering stability and growth for the  gather of their customers, employees and shareholders. Centrica Plcs non-financial performance can be outlined in terms of the following *BUSINESS PERFORMANCE OF CENTRICA* PLC LIMITATIONS OF RATIO ANALYSIS Ratios are useful methods of analyzing the performance and financial position of a business but they have their flaws which are seen as limitations and will be analyzed below.THE IMPACT OF THE CHANGE FROM UK GAAP TO IFRS ON THE CORPORATE REPORTING OF CENTRICA PLC that IFRS has improved the companys 2004 operating profit and statutory Earnings Per Share (EPS) reduction in shar   eholders  computer storage as a result of pensions deficit Adjustment the companys policy to link dividend to earnings thereby increasing pay out ratios. Some assets and liabilities will be treated differently which will affect timing of profit. CONCLUSION With  wing to the ratios analyzed above,Centrica Plc has an upper hand in the  muscle and gas market than it s competitor Scottish Power. Centrica Plcs turnover was very high in 2008 which shows that they made better sales than its competitor. Although Centricas sales turnover was high was high in 2008 but the profit margin dropped drastically. In the overall financial performance Centrica Plc made a loss of ? 645million in 2008 compared to the previous year 2007 when the company had a retained profit of ? 088million. This was considered to be an impact of the global financial crises that hit the UK and US economy causing increase in oil prices and a drastic fall again as the level of global oil demand rises and at the same time c   ausing a tight supply position. Finally, we can  say that from the record of 2007, the financial performance in 2008 was good despite the economic instability. Centrica Plc made strong progress against the strategic priorities set out at the end of year 2006.The global financial crises which remain very  dispute in the UK till date could pose as a  puzzle for many of the companys customers. But Centrica Plc promises to continue to place their customers needs at the forefront of their agenda, alongside the  mark to deliver increasing  long-run value for our shareholders FUTURE OF CENTRICA PLC According to the Chief Executives Review, some priorities have been set for the  futurity growth of Centrica which would help measure performance in year 2009.Some of which are To build on the companys growth platform Increasing the value of their customer base by expanding the overlap between the energy and services business. Also establishing a centralized service platform and the acquisition    and construction of gas and power assets which will enable the company to  vie efficiently in the energy market. To reduce risk through integration There will be more focus on UK in the coming year 2009, due to the high demand.Therefore more production has to be made by integrating/building closer  family with the National Oil Companies. To  commute British Gas In order for Centrica Plc to succeed, British Gas residential which seems to be the core backbone of Centricas business has to deliver high level of profitability. Therefore, there will have to be an integration of the British Gas Residential, British Gas Business and British Gas  function into a single customer-focused organization.Amidst all these  approaching plans briefly mentioned above, I can now conclusively say that the future performance of Centrica Plc is not  one hundred% certain of profitability as they are not exempted in the effect of the global financial crises which is still collision the UK economy. Although    demand for product  great power rise causing increase turnover but consumers might not be able to meet up with financial obligations of paying cash. So, Centrica must be prepared for more credit sales which might decrease its debtor turnover.Also, prices of product must be put into consideration despite the goal of maximizing profit not forgetting its competitors. And finally, the leadership of Centrica Plc will be playing major role in delivering stability and growth for the benefit of customers, employees and shareholders. REFERENCES Asmii Vernekar, 2009.  unattached at http//www. buzzle. com/articles/basic-accounting concepts-and principles. html. Assessed on fifteenth December, 2009 Buz/ed, 2009. Available at http//www. bized. co. uk/compfact/ratios/sdc5. htm Assessed on 13th December, 2009. Centrica Plc, 2005.International Financial  coverage Standards. Available at http//www. centrica. co. uk/files/results/2004_ifrs_transcript. pdf. Assessed on 15th December, 2009 FAME (Financ   ial Analysis Made Easy), 2009. Available at http//www. fame. bvdep. com/version-20091130. Assessed on eleventh December, 2009 Peter Atrill, and Eddie McLaney (2008), Accounting and Finance for Non-Specialists, sixth ed.  apprentice Hall, financial times. David  black lovage and Christopher Nobes. (2007), Financial Accounting, An International Introduction, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, financial times.Financial statement analysisMost notable products from Apple include the Phone, Pod, Pad, ND Imax personal computers. Apple is also involved in computer and web based application developments, which support their essential products such as Tunes, Safari, and Cloud. Through its innovative, streamlined,  easy designs, Apple has achieved a meteoric rise to industry domination since 2002. This growth, however, has recently come to a relative standstill following its peak in 2012 and has investors speculating if this marks the end of Apples bullish behavior, or just a minor setback because of the    companys change of management.Apple Inc. Saw a 9% total increase in revenue this sat year from SSL 56,508 million in 2012 to $170,910 million in 201 3(Apple Inc. , 2013). This growth is in part due to the release of the Phone As and c models, the introduction of the Pad Mini retina display as well as the companys normal day to day sales. This 9% growth may be some cause for concern though, as prior years increase in revenue saw a 45% average growth from year to year (44% in 2012 and 65% in 2011).Apples annual release of new products typically yields a 30% overall growth in revenue, which potentially indicates there is stagnation of growth overall in the current racket. This stagnation may be attributed either to heavy saturation of products within the current market, leaving little opportunity for expansive growth, or that consumers are unimpressed with the current product line. Apples peer firm Microsoft (MOST) has seen a modest 5% increase in total revenue from $73,723 million to    $77,849 million from 2012 to 213 respectively (Microsoft Corporation, 2013).This increase is consistent with prior 3 years which have each yielded a 4-5% increase in revenue. Compared to Apple, Microsoft has a relatively stable growth and be attributed to the elatedly consistent flow of products from year to year. The earnings per share ratio (PEPS) reflects the decline in overall profitability as well, with a 10% decline in Apples PEPS from $44. 43 to $40. 29 in 2012 and 2013 respectively (Apple Inc. , 2013).This can be attributed to two factors a decrease in net profit margin and a paralleled decrease in gross profit margin. There was an 11% decrease in net profits because of an increase in overall inventory. Increasing inventory will also increase a company s operating expenses as they accommodate new production. Companies typically raise their inventory evils as they release new products in anticipation for projected consumer demand for these products.As is the case with Apple,    this will have a negative impact on a companys net profit when there is less than anticipated demand for their new product. The depreciation of older inventories can also be responsible for an overall decrease in profitability. Microsoft has conversely seen an increase in PEPS from $2. 03 per shard to $ 2. 63 per share as a result of an increasing profit margin ratio from 23% to 28% in 201 3(Microsoft Corporation, 2013). Overall this increase can be attributed to an increase in ales over the period as new technologies are release.Overall PEPS increase as a result of Microsofts lower CEQ duty/investment into their company where as Apple has put much more equity into the release of their new releases in 2013. The increase in cost of sales is reflected in the decline of the gross profit margin ratio which is an additional indicator for a comprehensive decrease in profitability. Apples total gross profit fell from $44. 00 to $38. 00, in 2012 to 201 3 respectively, which is below the $42   . 00 industry average as their cost of sales experienced a 22% increase from 587,846 million to 1 06,606 million dollars.The decrease in gross profit is explained by a number of factors according to Apple introduction of new versions of existing products with higher cost structures and flat or reduced pricing a shift in sales mix to products with lower margins introduction of pad mini with a gross margin significantly below the Companys average product margins higher expenses associated with changes to certain Of the Companys service policies and other warranty costs price reductions on certain products, including pad 2 and phoned and an unfavorable impact room foreign exchange fluctuations. (Apple Inc. , 2013). An intangible effect that could positively impact Apples gross profit in the long run is an increase in the number of product consumers as well as a potential increase in consumer loyalty. When compared to Microsoft smaller 2% decrease of gross profit margin from 76% to 74%    in 2013. Microsoft decision to decrease sales price of windows 8 and decrease margins for the Oxbow One is responsible for the decrease in gross profit margin much like Apple. Tooth Apple inchs and Microsofts overall decrease of gross profit margin can be said o increase consumer satisfaction because more advanced technologies are sold at a lower margin thus giving a customer more value to their purchase. By lowering the price on certain high value items, such as the phone 4 and the pad 2 mentioned in Apples statement, Apple has made these products more accessible to potential customers with lower incomes or frugal spending habits.Furthermore, if there is an increase in Apple product consumers as a result of the change in price, there will likely be an increase in customer loyalty and satisfaction with these products. The PEPS decline and he increase in cost of sales can further be explored through an analysis of the companys balance sheet. There was a significant increase in Apples    inventory from $791 million to SSL . 76 billion from 2012 to 2013 respectively. This 123% increase in inventory demonstrates a wholesale investment in anticipated consumer demand and loyalty.Apple typically announces product releases long before the actual release date in order to build market hype and also sets release dates to coincide with times of historically greater spending in the market, such as the Christmas holiday season. This hyping recess, however, can go both ways in terms of sales by either positively building up consumer anticipation or by allowing time for consumers to second guess the product before it is released. There is also an inherent risk in inventory expansion based on projected sales consumers may just not be in the market for new products.An indication that this may be the case is found by looking at the inventory turnover ratio which experienced a decrease from 11 1 times per quarter to significantly lower 83 times per quarter. Microsoft, like Apple, ha   s seen a significant decrease of inventory turnover of 14% from 15. 2 times to 13. 13 times per quarter. This decrease in overall turnover much like, Apple is due to customer anticipation of newer release. However, these changes were significantly different for Microsoft as their offerings have less volatility, especially in sales of operating systems, and usually see less adoption by consumers in starting stages.Apple acid test ratio, involving current assets over current liabilities, stands at 1. 64 in 2013 which is an increase of approximately 8 points from 2012. This is much higher than the industrial average of 1. 0, indicating Apple is a relatively safe investment and has enough in current assets to cover its debt Obligations. This sets Apple as one of the safer blue chip stocks that can provide consistent wealth for their share holders. Microsoft has experienced a increase acid test ratio from 2012 to 201 3 from 2. 57 to 2. 66 respectively this is significantly higher than Ap   ple Inc. ND can be said to be a safer investment. Microsoft overall keeps their balance of ratios to asset very consistent and insures that they can meet their bottom line as well as provide security for their investors, more so than Apple In the third quarter of 201 3 Apple accrued total of 1 6,960 million dollars in debt. The long term debt was used to offset the repurchase of stock of $22. 9 billion as well as dividend equivalent rights of $10. 6 million dollars. This accrued debt helps Apple Inc avoid taxes of upwards of $9. 2 billion dollars (Burrows, 2013) meanwhile Apple will only incur a $308 million interest a year.Had they used their offshore cash Apple would have had to pay a 35% tax and will save another $1 00 million as these interest payments are tax deductible (Burrows, 2013). Apples move to take on this debt to finance $55 billion dollars in stock repurchase is an effort to increase overall earnings per share as well as increase total value to the consumer meanwhile    adding to overall company value. The statement of cash flows revealed that In 201 2 Apple board of directors authorized a $10 billion stock which was later raised to a total of $60 billion in 2013.Apple repurchased/retired a total of $22,860 million dollars worth of stock in 201 3 as opposed to issuance of 665 million in 2012. Apple stated that this repurchase was a move to increase end value to shareholders. Shareholders that are offered buy back will in turn gain profit and will decrease the overall outstanding shares. By decreasing the total shares the companys earnings per share ratio will consequently increase, and given the current plan should increase PEPS by around $4 over the following fiscal year (Hughes, 2013) and adding to the companys overall worth.The overall decrease in outstanding shares also decreases the total amount of dividends paid to investors thus cutting expense and adding to company revenues. Apple began issuing dividends toward the end of 2012 and has since    seen a significant raise in dividends issued to its stockholder. Apple has since issued $10,564 million of vividness to shareholders representing a 324% increase dividends paid for 2013 from the $2,488 of dividends paid in 2012. Quarterly dividends were raised by 15% from SO. 65 per share to $3. 05 per share in 2013.The price to earnings ratio also increased from 9% to 13 % as well as the increase in payout ratio from . 29 to. 06 reflects this change value to stockholders as a consequence of stock retirement and increased dividend payout.. A very lucrative opportunity presents itself for current stockholders as the prospective raise of PEPS due to buy back will ultimately add incredible attention value due to increased dividend yield. Microsofts plan to buy back a total $40 billion plan began in 2008, they began this buy back to increase overall PEPS and PIE as well as increase the companies payout ratio.Buyback has thus far increase PEPS however subsequent drops in PIE ratio from    12. 36 to 10. 24 and stagnant dividend yield make investment into Microsoft a riskier endeavor than Apple as the decrease in P/E does not bode well for buyer confidence. Though the higher dividend yield is still attractive to investors and is higher than that of Apple Inc. Apples market share in smart phones should e of particular concern to interested investors as of recent events. Market share, especially for key products, gauges the companys current position amongst its competition and overall pull within the market.It can effectively gauge if the company is meeting the needs of its consumers and prospective growth. Within the past year the Phone only gained around a 13% overall growth in sales, however this is miniscule compared to overall Smartened market growth of 44% in 2013. Apples market share shows further struggles as overall mobile market share decrease by a full 4% from 19% market share n 2012 to a 15% in 2013. (Gardner, 2013) However, other companies like Microsoft and    Samsung saw significant increases in SO use and hardware use with Samsung clearing 31% total market share from its 30% in 2012.This may be worrisome as Apple may not providing what customers want and can account for a decrease in overall prospective growth. However, this may be remedied by Apples breakthrough to markets china and Japan late in 2013. The departure of Steve Jobs and the arrival of Tim cook in august of 2011 has been a cause for a weaker overall product line. The recent introduction of ewe products have spawned a lackluster response by consumers especially in the release of the Phone 5 variants (as and c) as well as the improved retina display pad mini.These products neglected to offer anything new or revolutionary to set Apple apart, they were just mere improvements to tested product. The lack of ingenuity has potential to cause a decline Apples growth in sales and may cede market share competitors who have more to offer to the consumer. Microsoft on the other hand h   as remained consistent in its product offerings throughout the years. This is expected of Microsoft as hey re key product involves enterprise systems that provide basic needs for businesses.Financial Statement Analysis(2004-2008) Course Title Managing Financial Resources Course MSc. Finance Date 11th January 2010. TABLE OF CONTENT Executive Summary This report shows the analysis of the financial performance of Centrica Plc, one of the top energy business providers in UK. Based on my analysis from this report I can conclusively state that Centrica Plc has an upper hand in the energy and gas market than it s competitor Scottish Power. Centrica Plcs turnover was very high in 2008 which shows that it made better sales than its competitor.Although Centricas sales turnover was high in 2008 but the profit margin dropped drastically. In the overall financial performance Centrica Plc made a loss of ? 645million in 2008 compared to the previous year 2007 when the company had a retained profit    of ? 1088million. This was considered to be an impact of the global financial crises that hit the UK and US economy causing increase in oil prices and a drastic fall again as the level of global oil demand rises and at the same time causing a tight supply position.Centrica Plcs Total shareholders return has an upper hand when compared with other 99 members of the FTSE 100 in 2008. INTRODUCTION evaluate the impact of financial accounting concepts on corporate reporting of Centrica Plc. evaluate the limitations of ratio analysis discuss the role of management accounting in the evaluation of Centricas business performance. I have been motivated to choose Centrica Plc because of the type of product they deal in, which is energy. It is a product that is essential for all, not just households.And it will be good to know if this company is actually doing well in terms of profitability and customers satisfaction. LITERATURE REVIEW *PROFITABILITY RATIO ANALYSIS *OF CENTRICA PLC AND SCOTTISH    POWER (Reference FAME (Financial Analysis Made Easy) FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS OF CENTRICA PLC AND SCOTTISH POWER (Reference FAME (Financial Analysis Made Easy) GRAHPICAL PRESENTATIONS OF RATIOS drawframe drawframe drawframe drawframe drawframe drawframe ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS BASED ON THE GRAHPSAccording to Barry Elliot and Jamie Elliot, ratios show different items in the financial statements. A ratio is not useful in isolation and its usefulness depends on what aspects of the firms business affairs are being investigated. Ratios, according to them are a powerful tool in interpreting and understanding a companys account. Therefore, the graphs above show the performance of the Centrica plc and its competitor Scottish Power over a period of 5years and will be analyzed below. DEBTORS TURNOVER This ratio shows how long it takes debtors of a company to pay back credit purchases.In as mush as credit facilities enhances sale turnover in a competitive market   , it is very important to take adequate control of it because it is an essential part of working capital management. (Buz/ed, 2009) It is calculated as Debtors Turnover*= Average Debtors * ? 365days Centrica Plc has been able to achieve a positive stock turnover ratio over the years with a 55% less time between 2004 and 2008 compared to its competitor that has a longer time of 18% to sell off its products.This shows that Centrica Plc has more sales turnover than Scottish Power. The trend on the graph show that Centrica Plc has been more liquid than Scottish power because the higher the ratio, the more liquid the business is said to be. It is obvious from the graph that Centrica Plc is more liquid than Scottish Power. That is Centrica Plc has a better capacity to pay it short term debt than Scottish Power, with reference to their current ratio of 1. 12 to 0. 59 respectively in 2008. DISCUSSIONIMPACT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING CONCEPT UPON CORPORATE REPORTING OF CENTRICA PLC Going Concer   n The Board of directors of Centrica Plc continues to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statement because they have a reasonable expectation that the company has adequate resources needed to continue operational existence for the foreseeable future Business Entity Centrica Plc operates as a separate business entity from its investors. Cost Centrica Plc reports the market value of its assets.Sincerity The financial Statement of Centrica Plc is prepared and audited by auditors from the Pricewaterhouse coopers Monetary Unit The financial statement of Centrica Plc shows a single monetary unit dominated in GBP (? ) because the parent company is in the UK. Dual concept Centrica presents it total assets as liabilities (debt finance) plus equity (shares). Accrual The revenue or income of Centrica Plc are recorded when they are actually earned. (Asmii V. 2009) ROLES OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING ON THE BUSI*NESS PERFORMANCE OF CENTRICA PLC According to Institute of Manageme   nt Accountants, Management accounting can be defined as the internal business building role of accounting and finance professionals who work inside the organizations They are concerned about the growth of the business in terms of evaluating the business prospects, budgeting and forecasting, implementing and monitoring internal controls for the purpose of achieving economic value.The Board of Directors of Centrica Plc believes that there must be high standards of corporate governance which are relevant to the overall integrity and performance of the business. The Company adopted a new set of Articles of Association which states the power of the Board of directors at the 2008 Annual General Meeting and stated below are few of the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to the managerial accounting of the company. the Groups corporate governance and system of internal control development of strategy and major policies nterim dividend payments and recommendation of final dividend   s the appointment and removal of Directors and the Company Secretary the Groups corporate responsibility arrangements including health, safety and environmental matters reviewing management performance approval of the annual operating plan, the financial statements and major acquisitions and disposals The Board gives thorough monitoring to the development of the companys strategies and also during the year 2008, the Board had a full review of the companys overall strategy with the assistance of an independent external consultant.The Board also place value on their investors and promote communication program in order to hear their views of their shareholders as regards the key matters affecting the company. The Chief Executive and Group Finance Director held regular meetings with the Companys major shareholders during the year and the Companys Rights Issue which was the main topic of discussion was successfully completed during December 2008 after which an approval was given at the C   ompanys General Meeting held on 21 November 2008.The companys Executive Committees also established a control infrastructure to ensure proper monitoring and management where major risks have been identified. *THE NON-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE* OF CENTRICA PLC The fluctuation in demand and prices of oil worldwide as well as the global financial crises in 2008 made Centrica Plc face series of challenges and the Chairman of the company (Roger Carr) tagged the year a difficult year.But despite the difficulty, the company still performed well because it is a company that aims at delivering stability and growth for the benefit of their customers, employees and shareholders. Centrica Plcs non-financial performance can be outlined in terms of the following *BUSINESS PERFORMANCE OF CENTRICA* PLC LIMITATIONS OF RATIO ANALYSIS Ratios are useful methods of analyzing the performance and financial position of a business but they have their flaws which are seen as limitations and will be analyzed belo   w.THE IMPACT OF THE CHANGE FROM UK GAAP TO IFRS ON THE CORPORATE REPORTING OF CENTRICA PLC that IFRS has improved the companys 2004 operating profit and statutory Earnings Per Share (EPS) reduction in shareholders fund as a result of pensions deficit Adjustment the companys policy to link dividend to earnings thereby increasing pay out ratios. Some assets and liabilities will be treated differently which will affect timing of profit. CONCLUSION With reference to the ratios analyzed above,Centrica Plc has an upper hand in the energy and gas market than it s competitor Scottish Power. Centrica Plcs turnover was very high in 2008 which shows that they made better sales than its competitor. Although Centricas sales turnover was high was high in 2008 but the profit margin dropped drastically. In the overall financial performance Centrica Plc made a loss of ? 645million in 2008 compared to the previous year 2007 when the company had a retained profit of ? 088million. This was considered t   o be an impact of the global financial crises that hit the UK and US economy causing increase in oil prices and a drastic fall again as the level of global oil demand rises and at the same time causing a tight supply position. Finally, we can say that from the record of 2007, the financial performance in 2008 was good despite the economic instability. Centrica Plc made strong progress against the strategic priorities set out at the end of year 2006.The global financial crises which remain very challenging in the UK till date could pose as a problem for many of the companys customers. But Centrica Plc promises to continue to place their customers needs at the forefront of their agenda, alongside the determination to deliver increasing long-term value for our shareholders FUTURE OF CENTRICA PLC According to the Chief Executives Review, some priorities have been set for the future growth of Centrica which would help measure performance in year 2009.Some of which are To build on the com   panys growth platform Increasing the value of their customer base by expanding the overlap between the energy and services business. Also establishing a centralized service platform and the acquisition and construction of gas and power assets which will enable the company to compete efficiently in the energy market. To reduce risk through integration There will be more focus on UK in the coming year 2009, due to the high demand.Therefore more production has to be made by integrating/building closer relationship with the National Oil Companies. To transform British Gas In order for Centrica Plc to succeed, British Gas Residential which seems to be the core backbone of Centricas business has to deliver high level of profitability. Therefore, there will have to be an integration of the British Gas Residential, British Gas Business and British Gas Services into a single customer-focused organization.Amidst all these future plans briefly mentioned above, I can now conclusively say that t   he future performance of Centrica Plc is not 100% certain of profitability as they are not exempted in the effect of the global financial crises which is still hitting the UK economy. Although demand for product might rise causing increase turnover but consumers might not be able to meet up with financial obligations of paying cash. So, Centrica must be prepared for more credit sales which might decrease its debtor turnover.Also, prices of product must be put into consideration despite the goal of maximizing profit not forgetting its competitors. And finally, the leadership of Centrica Plc will be playing major role in delivering stability and growth for the benefit of customers, employees and shareholders. REFERENCES Asmii Vernekar, 2009. Available at http//www. buzzle. com/articles/basic-accounting concepts-and principles. html. Assessed on 15th December, 2009 Buz/ed, 2009. Available at http//www. bized. co. uk/compfact/ratios/sdc5. htm Assessed on 13th December, 2009. Centrica Pl   c, 2005.International Financial Reporting Standards. Available at http//www. centrica. co. uk/files/results/2004_ifrs_transcript. pdf. Assessed on 15th December, 2009 FAME (Financial Analysis Made Easy), 2009. Available at http//www. fame. bvdep. com/version-20091130. Assessed on 11th December, 2009 Peter Atrill, and Eddie McLaney (2008), Accounting and Finance for Non-Specialists, 6th ed. Prentice Hall, financial times. David Alexander and Christopher Nobes. (2007), Financial Accounting, An International Introduction, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, financial times.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment