'Enuma Elish vs. Genesis Essay\r'

'As a whole, the installation myth of Enuma Elish is quite different from the other myths in the Primal Myths book. The story of Genesis is an exception however, where in that respect argon more connaturalities than differences. The creation stories of Genesis and Enuma Elish rush a similar framework, only when do leave in several ways. This essay aims to compare and wedge these two creation myths while looking for green themes and possible cultural connections. Enuma Elish contains several gods who played a distinct role in the creation, most significantly Apsu and Tiamat. After Apsu and Tiamat, the other gods are created, and reside in the body of Tiamat. Enuma Elish is a story of how the gods interact and go d single a dramatic power struggle. The humanity is created as a result of the gods’ actions and decisions. In a similar way, but with notable differences, Genesis consists of only if one god who simplisti knelly creates the world, with no drama or power str uggles. In Genesis, â€Å"God” decides to move in the world, and in seven â€Å"days” (some quantifys known as presbyopic periods of time) creates all that we know of, with great emphasis on man.\r\nEnuma Elish also places great importance onto man, and for a similar reason. The Enuma Elish story ends with the creation of man to do the material work instead of the gods, a prime typesetters case being the construction of Babylon. Genesis does not outline the purpose of man in an indentured common sense but instead says that it is for man to â€Å"be blue-fruited and multiply… provoke dominion…over either living thing…” (Sproul, 124). â€Å"God” also rest on the seventh day, the day after he created man. Most similar are the physical creations in both myths. Both are kindled through the medium of â€Å"divine speech”, or the speech of the gods. Each day and each generation are linked unitedly if closely examined. In Enuma Elish, we progress to the half-dozen generations of Tiamat and Apsu, Lahamu, Kishar, Anu, Ea, and Marduk, respectively. In the story of Genesis, we have the six main days of creation, and both stories have the time of rest (or seventh day). In the initial express of the creation stories, we have a time when res publica was void, or as some prefer to call it, chaos. Simply, a lack of order enclosed by darkness, as shown by â€Å"When there was no heaven,/no earthly concern, no height, no depth, no name,/when Apsu was alone” (92) and â€Å"The earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep…” (123).\r\nThe commencement two developments in both stories included light, followed by the creation of the firmament, â€Å"the lines of sky and earth/stretched where horizons meet to steal/cloud from silt” (92). In the third development, dry out land was fabricated, then the skies were developed â€Å"He communicate positions†¦in the sky, he gave them a starry outlook as constellations…” (102), and in the sixth development, men and women were created. As a finishing touch, Genesis reads â€Å"…God rest from all his work which he had done in creation.” (125) and in Enuma Elish, â€Å"When all the gods sat down together there was wine and feasting and laughter…” (106). If one studies the background behind The Bible, one would know that the Babylonians held the Jewish people in exile. One might think that the story of Genesis might be a derivative of the Babylonian story Enuma Elish via cultural influences. In addition, Enuma Elish is dated to be older than the story of Genesis, leaving this theory as a sound possibility.\r\nIn a Christian dominated world, many would reject the fact that the story of Genesis is unoriginal, because of the possibility that evaluate a story as unoriginal would make it inferior; thus leading many skeptics to only question the validit y of Judaist teachings. In conclusion, Enuma Elish and Genesis have a distinctly akin nature, with the possibility of usual cultural influences. Through deep auditing, the two creation myths are found to be comparable in many respects. Each goes through equivalent developments, but not without important differences. From here, we leave it to future archaeologic discoveries to uncover the truth of these stories and their origins.\r\n'